Delivered work March 2025–Present
College.money education loans
Students needed more than a loan enquiry: the right evidence, a suitable lender and a clear next step.
Visit College.money (opens in a new tab)My role I owned the education-loan journey, integrations, operations, stage-level measurement and partner commercials.
Why this mattered
An education-loan enquiry is only the beginning. Students still need the right evidence, a suitable lender and a clear next action. Repeated document requests and uncertain handoffs can leave an interested applicant without a case the lender can assess.
Prepare a case the lender can use
I organized the journey around preparing an assessable case, rather than stopping at lead capture. Common inputs, document collection, eligibility pre-checks and a defined lender handoff formed a thin origination layer. The point was to make case preparation part of the product instead of leaving the applicant to discover the process independently.
A shorter form can appear successful while passing an incomplete case to the next team. I therefore treated student effort and lender readiness as one design tension. Collecting everything up front would also create unnecessary work; the useful question was what the student needed to provide now and which requirement belonged to the receiving lender or a later step.
The historical education-lending remit included upskilling and tier-2/3 applicants. The current College.money study-abroad pages are a later public reference, not a record of every historical feature. In those references, destination constrains university choice and readiness guidance separates evidence needed to begin from visa or I-20 items that may follow. They illustrate the case-preparation questions, rather than prove an authenticated historical journey.
Balance student effort, case readiness and operating cost
I worked with engineering on the application and lender handoff, growth on CashKaro distribution, and operations on submitted cases. MoEngage and internal dashboards exposed abandonment and delay at individual stages. That let the team examine where applicants were getting stuck and whether the next team had usable information, rather than discuss only a final conversion total.
I also owned lender pricing, payout discussions, KYC responsibilities and service levels. More enquiries were useful only if cases could progress at a workable processing cost and satisfy agreed commercial conditions. Loan principal, earned partner revenue and contribution after acquisition and processing costs were different measures. A completed application could not stand in for all three.
At each handoff, the student and the receiving team need to know what is missing and who acts next. That is the lesson of this work: a completed form matters only when the lender can use the case it receives, and the operating team can follow its progress.
What changed and what remains uncertain
The work connected student information, evidence collection, pre-checks and routing with partner operations and commercials. Comparable cohorts and a reconciled profit figure are unavailable, so this case makes no quantified causal or profitability claim. Public captures show discovery and readiness guidance, not completed offers or lender decisions.
Sources & technical detail
Original artifacts, detailed tables and source notes.